Month: August 2021

Vodafone Essar Cellular V/S Department Of Income Tax

“It is understood that the relationship between the parties solely on the principal to principal basis” Case name: Vodafone Essar Cellular V/S Department Of Income Tax Case number: ITA Number- 1415 and 1416 Court: Income tax appellate tribunal Bench: Justice U.B.S BEDI Decided on: JUNE 16, 2009 Relevant Act/Sections: Section 194H of the income tax …

Vodafone Essar Cellular V/S Department Of Income Tax Read More »

TRF Ltd. V. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd.

Once the arbitrator has become ineligible by operation of law, he cannot nominate another as an arbitrator Case name: TRF Ltd.. & Ors. V. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd. Case number: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5306 OF 2017 Court: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Bench: Dipak Misra J, A.M. Khanwilkar J, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar J Decided on: …

TRF Ltd. V. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd. Read More »

The Project Director V/S M. Vijayalakshmi

A statute cannot be interpreted in such a manner as to make the remedy worse than a disease Case name: The Project Director V/S M. Vijayalakshmi Case number: C.M.A Number- 560 of 2018 Court: Madras high court Bench: Justice T.S Sivagnanam, Justice R. Tharani Decided on: FEBRUARY 13, 2020 Relevant Act/Sections: Arbitration and conciliation act, …

The Project Director V/S M. Vijayalakshmi Read More »

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd V/S P.S.T.S & Sons Pvt Ltd

One of the general principle is that an agent is not personally liable to third parties. But under certain circumstances, an agent can also be made liable. When he becomes liable he can sue and be sued. This general principle is expressed in Section 230 of the Indian Contract Act BRIEF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY: …

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd V/S P.S.T.S & Sons Pvt Ltd Read More »

Sudhir Gopi V. Indira Gandhi National Open University

The arbitral tribunal, being a creature of limited jurisdiction, has no power to extend the scope of the arbitral proceedings to include persons who have not consented to arbitrate. Thus, an arbitrator would not have the power to pierce the corporate veil to bind other parties who have not agreed to arbitrate. Case name: Sudhir …

Sudhir Gopi V. Indira Gandhi National Open University Read More »

Sterlite Technologies Limited vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Court cannot interfere with an arbitral award on the ground that Justice has not been done Case name: Sterlite Technologies Limited vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Case number/Citation:  O.P.Nos.200 of 2011 and 774 of 2012 Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench:  Hon’ble Justice P.T.ASHA Decided on: December 11, 2019                                                                          Relevant Act/Sections: Section 34 …

Sterlite Technologies Limited vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Read More »

State Of U.P. And Ors. Vs. Renusagar Power Co. And Others

The horizon of the doctrine of lifting corporate veil is expanding Case name: STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Vs. RENUSAGAR POWER co. AND OTHERS Case number: 1988 AIR 1737 1988 SCR Supl. (1) 627 Court: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Bench: MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J) RANGNATHAN, S. Decided on: 28/07/1988 Relevant Act/Sections: U.P. Electricity (Duty) Act, 1952 …

State Of U.P. And Ors. Vs. Renusagar Power Co. And Others Read More »

Srl Ranbaxy Ltd, Noida VS Assessee

“Sometimes the contention has neither been rebutted, nor can be thrown out neck and crop” Case name: Srl Ranbaxy ltd, noida V/S Assessee Case number: ITA Number- 434{Del} 2011 Court: Income tax appellate tribunal Bench: Justice A.D JAIN Decided on: NOVEMBER 10, 2010 Relevant Act/Sections: Section 194H, 40 BRIEF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY: The assessment …

Srl Ranbaxy Ltd, Noida VS Assessee Read More »